There is one published range, a short list of things that move the number, and a lot of marketing. This page sorts them.
One buyer's own program page lists compensation to the company of $100K to $2M+ for an approved data package. That is the only figure we quote, because it is the only one the buyer put in writing. It is a range for approved packages, which means the buyer reviewed the records first and decided to license them. It is a published range, and we promise nothing.

Both buyers we work with state that they remove personal and sensitive information from the copy before it is used. Names, addresses and account details are replaced. What survives is the shape of the work: how a request was handled, how a decision was made, what the outcome was. That is what an AI model learns from, and that is what the buyer pays for.
Nobody can tell you before a buyer reviews the records, and we will not pretend otherwise. What we can tell you in two minutes is whether your company fits a buyer's published criteria, and which program to apply to. The buyer takes it from there and pays your company directly if it approves a package.
No. We quote one published range and nothing else. The buyer reviews your records and makes the offer. Anyone who gives you a figure before that is guessing.
No. It is the range one buyer publishes for approved packages. Approval is the buyer's decision, and some applications are declined.
Not always. Years of consistent records matter as much as headcount. A 40-person firm with twelve years of one email system can hold more usable history than a 200-person firm that changed systems every year.
That is set out in the buyer's agreement with your company. We do not see the agreement and do not advise on it.
A referral fee from the buyer when a deal is approved. Your company pays nothing.
Seven questions, an answer on the page, a copy by email with the right application link. No call, no files, no fee.
Check in two minutes